ASPECTS OF CIVIL ADMINISTRATION AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT IN
NINETEENTH CENTURY KNOTTINGLEY
By Dr. TERRY SPENCER B.A. (HONS), Ph D.
Preliminary Draft May 2005
INTRODUCTION
The township of Knottingley, situated three miles north-east of
Pontefract in the Wapentake of Osgoldcross, developed from a 6th century
Saxon settlement in a forest clearing on the south bank of the river
Aire. (1)
By the time of the Norman Conquest of 1066 the settlement had acquired
the status of a manorial vill.
The first documentation concerning the settlement is an entry in the
Domesday Book of 1086 which reveals the Baret, a Saxon thane, had been
dismissed as the manorial head and replaced by the Norman, Ranolf, a sub
tenant of the de Lacy’s, Tenants in Chief to William I and lords of the
honour of Pontefract of which Knottingley was a constituent part. (2)
With the death of Henry de Lacy in 1311 the lordship of Pontefract
became the fiefdom of Thomas, Earl of Lancaster, who inherited the
holding through his marriage to Alice, daughter of Henry de Lacy.
Thereafter Knottingley was to remain a manor of the Lancasters’ and
following the seizure of the crown by Henry Bolingbroke in 1399, the
manorial vill became Crown land. (3)
From the early middle ages the vill although expanding, had a
significance far beyond its size for the erection of a mill on the river
bank to the west of the manorial demesne necessitated the construction
of a weir across the waterway to provide the motive power to drive the
mill wheel. Consequently, navigation of the waterway above the mill dam
was curtailed, necessitating the transhipment of all goods and materials
below that point. As a result, the manor of Knottingley became an
important inland river port having a dual capacity as the port which
serviced the hinterland of the West Riding of Yorkshire and also as the
base from which the nearby fortress of Pontefract Castle was victualled.
The decline and demise of the feudal system from the fourteenth
century set in motion the reorganisation of feudal obligations and the
redistribution of land holdings. The redistribution of manorial land at
Knottingley carried an important benefit for at an earlier time, the
origins of which are obscure, the tenant in chief had granted freehold
status to all land with the manorial vill for a singular service
rendered to him by the inhabitants. (4)
The dissolution of the monasteries in 1539 made large tracts of land
available to the Crown which from the sixteenth century was sold to
subsidise the extravagant lifestyle of the impecunious Tudor and early
Stuart monarchs. The manor of Knottingley was held by the Wildbore
family from whom it eventually passed to one Grimsditch who had married
the daughter of Richard Wildbore.
The Grimsditch family were of yeoman stock, not particularly wealthy,
and when one of the sons incurred substantial debts the only recourse
was to sell part of the manorial holding. Thus, by the seventeenth
century the manor of Knottingley had been divided into four separate
holdings, one part being held by John Grimsditch, a second by Stephen
Grimsditch, tenant of one of the recently created Cridling Park farms, a
third portion was held by John Wildbore and the remaining land by
Richard Smyth, all being of yeoman stock. (5)
In 1637 Sir Arthur Ingram, a nouveau rich capitalist of a type
engendered by the spirit of that era, having financial interests in the
township and its vicinity, purchased the manorial rights at Knottingley
and installed his nephew and namesake in a newly built manor house at
Hill Top, close to the mansion of the Wildbores’ which stood adjacent to
St. Botolph’s Church. (6)
For 150 years from 1637, the manor of Knottingley was in the
possession of the Ingrams and their descendants but following the demise
of the Rev. Gooderick Ingram in 1787 the manor was again sub divided and
at the time of the enclosure survey in 1795 the manorial lands were held
by the families of Frank, Wasney, Poole and Thompson. (7)
The limestone extraction industry whilst long established within and
around the township of Knottingley developed rapidly from the
mid-eighteenth century stimulating land purchase. As a result, by the
first decade of the nineteenth century much of the manorial land,
particularly within the former open field to the south of the town, had
been acquired by limestone merchants such as Edward Gaggs, William
Moorhouse and Benjamin Atkinson, who by virtue of wealth obtained
through their varied business interests, were the leading figures in the
social and economic life of Knottingley.
The rise of Knottingley as a significant river port involved with the
coastal and inland trade from the fourteenth century also encouraged the
introduction of local shipbuilding and allied trades as a corollary to
the maritime activity. Thus, by the beginning of the nineteenth century
the place was a hive of activity with the potential for further
industrial and commercial development stimulated by the rapid progress
of the Industrial Revolution. Yet despite the developing trends the
settlement at that time was little more than an extensive village,
predominantly agricultural and pastoral in nature, retaining many
aspects of its rural characteristics, its low lying verdant fields,
limestone buildings, and gardens hanging above the craggy quarries with
their gently smoking kilns and with numerous keels and sloops swaying
peacefully at anchor on the river Aire. (8) The sense of timelessness
and romanticism which produced the picturesque scene was, however,
superficial for beneath the surface, poverty, squalor and disease marked
the daily life of the majority of the inhabitants bringing hardship and
suffering in profusion while the lack of a common standard of hygiene
produced periodic epidemics from which even the more socially detached
wealthy middle class citizens within the town were not immune.
Consequently, by the advent of the nineteenth century an admix of
national legislation and local self interest combined to produce
somewhat grudging measures of poor relief and social and civic
improvement designed to alleviate the worst conditions faced by the
populace.
The course of the nineteenth century was therefore a period of
transformation from ancient to modern township so that by the advent of
the following century Knottingley was a prosperous industrial centre
characterised by the pride of its inhabitants in the town to which they
belonged.
It is the purpose of this study to examine specific aspects of the
developing township during the nineteenth century to reveal the course
of the transformation and its effect upon the people of that age.
©2005 Dr. Terry Spencer